The trial for Vanesa Zabala's murder has begun: "It was a hate crime."
The trial began yesterday for the murder of Vanesa Zabala, a trans woman killed on March 29, 2013, in Reconquista, in the northern part of Santa Fe province. The four defendants pleaded not guilty before the Sentencing Court in the city of Vera. The court expects to reach a verdict on December 7.

Share
By Soledad Mizerniuk and Victoria Rodríguez, from Santa Fe.
Photos courtesy of Vanesa Zabala's family and friends. The trial for the transphobic murder of Vanesa Zabala, killed on March 29, 2013, in Reconquista, in the north of Santa Fe province, began yesterday. The four defendants pleaded not guilty before the Sentencing Court in the city of Vera. The court expects to issue a ruling on December 7. This landmark case nearly collapsed and could set a precedent for the pursuit of justice in other transphobic murders.

READ MORE: Vanesa Zabala's transphobic murder: four sisters seek justice
Vanesa's face filled the courtroom, emblazoned on the t-shirts and banners of her loved ones. Seven family members and activists from various organizations supporting the call for justice arrived early in the morning, braving the persistent rain, at the Vera Sentencing Court, 40 kilometers from the crime scene. "It was a hate crime" The prosecution presented the case for the crime of aggravated homicide due to cruelty, treachery, the involvement of minors, the premeditated participation of two or more people, and for hatred of gender identity (Article 80, sections 2, 4 and 6, 45 quater and 45 of the Penal Code). Federico Lombardi, the Zabala family's lawyer, remarked: “The appropriate concept for me is transvesticide“Because it was a hate crime.” Eliana Ibarra, a leader of the Justice for Vanesa Zabala Front, alluded to the same concept. “The plaintiff’s lawyer mentioned the concept of transvesticide, which, although it doesn’t exist in the Penal Code, is a clear indication of violence against the LGBT community (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender),” she told Present.An emblematic case
Regarding the legal precedent this case may set, he explained: “This is a landmark case for northern Santa Fe and for the entire country. That's why This could set an important precedent for defining the use of the legal terms "travesticide" and "transfemicide," a struggle being waged by the LGBT movement, and could be useful for cases that have not yet gone to trial, such as those of Diana Sacayán or Laura Moyano.”.READ MORE: Two years without Diana Sacayán: "She continues to be a beacon"
There are four defendants
The four defendants arrived at the trial as free men and were accompanied only by their lawyers. No family or friends were present to offer them support. At the start of the hearing, they all agreed that their lives had been “ruined” because they had spent three years in prison. The first testimonies of eight police officers were then heard. These were the officers who arrived on March 29, 2013, in the area known as El Triángulo and found Vanesa lying among weeds nearly a meter high.Eight police officers testified
While they didn't provide many details about the condition of the trans woman, as those testimonies will be requested from the forensic doctors who examined the body, they did describe the operation carried out at the scene. They also gave their account of how the evidence that led to the arrest of the four defendants and two other individuals, who were minors at the time and are suspected of involvement in the transphobic murder, was preserved.



Years of struggle
For Vanesa's family, her friends, and the organizations that supported her demand for justice, these have not been easy years. Delays in establishing a court capable of conducting the trial led to the defendants' release because the legally mandated time limits had expired. The case nearly collapsed during the reform of the penal system in the province. The sisters had been denied the possibility of becoming plaintiffs“The participation of the plaintiffs was debated for an entire year, until they finally accepted us,” Lombardi emphasized. “Defense attorney Enzo Masat (José Luis Petroni’s private lawyer) also delayed the proceedings by requesting that the defendants be re-evaluated.” After the long struggle to reach this point, in a dialogue with Presents The plaintiff's lawyer stated that "the outcome of the first round of testimonies is positive.""An outstanding debt of the Santa Fe State"
From the Justice for Vanesa Zabala Front, Ibarra said: “It comforts us to see the family's relief at finally reaching the trial. This was an outstanding debt of the Santa Fe government, given all the obstacles along the way. We had to fight many battles. There is some weariness, but this situation brings us relief and comfort as activists and militants because we know that forging alliances between organizations and taking to the streets bears fruit.”

How is the trial progressing?
The trial will continue tomorrow with the testimonies of the forensic doctors. Sandra Zabala, Vanesa's sister, is expected to testify on Monday. The verdict is expected on December 7. In between, approximately 50 witnesses from both sides will appear before the court.We are Present
We are committed to a type of journalism that delves deeply into the realm of the world and offers in-depth research, combined with new technologies and narrative formats. We want the protagonists, their stories, and their struggles to be present.
SUPPORT US
FOLLOW US
Related Notes
We Are Present
This and other stories don't usually make the media's attention. Together, we can make them known.


